The current
collision of liberal and conservative ideology has forced much of the liberal
base to re-examine long cherished beliefs. The reasons are different for each
of the groups which make up the liberal base: for Jewish voters, it is that the
left has chosen to embrace Islam and distance itself from Israel; for blacks,
they are feeling the brunt of failed socialist economic policies; for women, they
must consider the Islamic treatment of women and new revelations of a hostile
work environment in the White House; and for young people who have been
brainwashed in liberal-dominated universities, the harsh reality of the
stifling effect on job prospects has caused them to rethink the utopian myths
of liberalism. Homosexuals must consider the elites cuddling with an ideology
where they are not treated so well either.
While each of
these individuals within these groups must look deep within themselves to
answer questions about what the liberal elites are really about, they must also
examine, through a different lens, who exactly are these conservatives.
There is a common thread which originally captured the
various elements of the liberal base: the idea that a paternal government will
protect the underdog and the disenfranchised and that leaving the weak of our
society to the wiles of competitive free market capitalism is just too
daunting.
The Reagan years, however, made the case that a
healthy free market economy is the best answer: jobs became available for even
the less competitive of our society. All income brackets were better served by
a thriving economy whose engine was unfettered capitalism. A level of safety
net could then begin to operate without being a drain on the economy.
This historical fact, however, is a direct threat
to socialist elites. They were disappointed that there were less of “the weak” to
need them. The irony is that liberal megalomaniacs need people to be weak and
needy; they want people to depend on them, for this is the source of their
power. So, contrary to being compassionate, the truth is they are motivated by
one thing only: power.
While both capitalism and socialism contain destructive
narcissists, the former system contains offsets with the rule of law. Under
socialism, dependence is institutionalized and the liberties of self-determination
are thwarted altogether. Everyone is equally poor, dependent and weak under the
elites.
Evidence of narcissism within the left can be found
in their embrace of Islam and distancing from both Israel and Christianity.
What do islamofascists, with their insistence on
sharia law, have in common with socialists? They both involve centralized
control over the masses. The socialists do not care about the effect on women’s
rights or the threat to Jews and Christians if they can acquire a tool to help establish
more power and control of the populace.
It is time for Jewish citizens to understand that
their enemy is not Christianity and Conservatism. The right in this country is
not the Nazi right. The Tea Party is now called the extreme right wing even while
they stand for nothing but small government, the Constitution and fiscal
responsibility!
Blacks no longer need the government to control
their lives either. There are laws in place to protect against
institutionalized prejudice. The last thing they need is to be enslaved by
elites who do not want them to believe that they can make it alone on their
merits in a capitalistic economy.
Women also now have protections under the law and
need not subscribe to an ideology who flirts with the epitome of prejudice
against them: sharia law.
And the same goes for homosexuals: to not be
satisfied with some form of civil union instead of trespassing on the age-old
institution of marriage is ludicrous when compared to partnering with an
ideology that caters to sharia law’s treatment.
It is time for all Americans to come together to
reject the tyranny of socialism.
No comments:
Post a Comment